Except that consistency, per se, provides us no useful insight whatsoever into the thus allegedly consistently produced quality, now does it?
According to our own Weare Community News:
A team of assessors from the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, Inc. (CALEA) will visit Weare on April 6 to examine all aspects of the Weare Police Department’s policy and procedures, management, operations, and support services. ...Do allow your humble chronicler to synopsize the evening's agenda items: "We are The Accreditors. Any questions? Great! Drive safely!" Not quite the "public role" one might have been excused for expecting, no?
As part of the on-site assessment, agency employees and members of the community are invited to offer comments at a public information session that Monday, April 6, at 7:00 p.m. in the Weare Public Safety Complex Training Room at 144 North Stark Highway, Weare.
This appears to be the local arm of the accrediting cartel. My understanding is that, much like ISO9000, this certification merely confirms that a consistent process is in place, not that that process is actually effective or lawful (as opposed to merely and ostensibly "legal") or desirable, or anything.
And I suspect contrary to Rep. Kurk's hopeful assessment, Weare taxpayers will be paying regardless of the outcome. But they get a plaque an' everything. Hey, what if we made the cops pay for it, themselves? Betcha it suddenly wouldn't be quite so important then, eh...?
- Weare's interim chief says transition is smooth | New Hampshire
- Weare officials start search for new police chief | Concord Monitor
- Weare Community News | Remember Tonight's Meeting (archive)
- Accreditation may increase police accountability - 7/31/2020